Driverless cars and the doom of auto insurance. Myth?

Driverless Car Accident Mockup Jakarta
At the famed annual carnival for capitalists, the Oracle of Omaha…well, prophesied.
A Berkshire share holder asked “Google’s self driving cars are expected to hit the road within 10 years. How does this new technology impact auto insurance premiums and how is GEICO preparing itself for a future with no car accidents?” The Oracle opined that if Google’s self-driving car does eventually prevent accidents, it would be a “real threat to the auto insurance business.” Although any change would take a long time, GEICO is expected to be doing more business five years from now.
Here are my thoughts on the future of auto insurance:
  1. The US car parc is estimated at 250m. While self-driving cars may become more common place in the US, all of the cars already on the roads aren’t going to be replaced in under a decade.
  2. The global car parc is estimated at about 770m. Replacement of some of the cars with driverless cars may begin to happen in mature economies like Europe or Japan. Globally, it ain’t happening in 10 years.
  3. Automotive insurance covers more than just passenger cars. It includes two wheelers, three wheelers, 8 wheelers, 20 wheelers, light commercial vehicles, earth moving equipment, industrial and farm equipment. A large part of the non-passenger car segment isn’t going driverless any time soon.
  4. While a large number of accidents seem to occur due to driver error, insurance also covers damage to the vehicle due to arson, flood, fire or a random tree fall. Considering these events are rare and risk from arson or fire is minimal, auto insurance premiums will come down substantially but insurance is here to stay.
  5. A new class of unanticipated accidents could arise due to erroneous driver less systems, electrical short circuits or explosion of batteries. Some one has to insure for this class of accidents. Is it going to be car manufacturers or battery manufacturers?
  6. Instead of insuring vehicles, insurance companies will move on to insuring occupants, property and other key components of the vehicle such as batteries or driverless systems.
  7. In a critical area such as this, the lobby will fight hard with the government to ensure insurance remains mandatory at least until there is substantial data to prove the technology is robust and reliable to entrust human lives and property to driverless cars.
  8. Around the globe, an estimated 3 billion commute to work every day. Advancements in technology, remote connectivity and secure data exchange may substantially encourage telecommuting, thus reducing travel by passenger cars or personal mobility vehicles.
  9. Under constrained resources and towards promoting a greener planet, governments are already investing in next generation mass transit systems. Fewer cars means fewer insurance premiums.
  10. If insurance premiums become super cheap due to reduced coverage requirements, a basic auto insurance policy could very well be packaged into other products and offerings such as credit cards – much like is done today with life insurance.

Considering the critical nature of the driverless systems, it is absolutely important that they are robust to handle any situation automatically or intelligently pass control to an already distracted driver. It will take time for the technology and infrastructure to mature for cars to be 100% driverless. More importantly, so long as the 770m driver operated vehicles continue to ply on the roads and the driverless enabled cars require human intervention from time to time, car insurance is here to stay.

In my opinion, car insurance isn’t going away any time soon. Auto insurance companies aren’t going away any time soon either. However, auto insurance companies need to measure the impact of reduced automobile usage due to other criteria like telecommuting, increase of online shopping and commerce, increased adoption of mass transit systems and packaging of basic auto insurance with credit cards or life insurance policies. Reduced driving may encourage drivers to ask “why should I own a car?” or “why should I pay so much insurance for limited use?” or “give me a pay-per-use insurance model“. This has the potential to significantly disrupt the traditional auto insurance industry.
As I’ve written in my earlier article, An algorithm for driverless cars in Indiait’s one thing for a reckless or distracted driver to cause an accident. Imagine failure of logic programmed by a corporation – opens up a pandora’s box much larger than the Concorde story.
Image credit: Youtube
Vijay Gummadi

Lover. Dreamer. Adrenaline junkie. Reggae | Tech enthusiast. Startup crazy | Head Monk & Avid story-teller @ FunMonk | Accidentally, Founder, CarZ :)

Comments are closed.